Are you watching the PBS/Ken Burns and Lynn Novick Film,
“The Vietnam War?” For those of us in
the Baby Boomer Generation, it’s our war.
I have watched the first three episodes.
During the second episode I began to feel depressed, mainly because of
all the mistakes and missed opportunities to avoid war, and I could barely get
through the third episode, which brought out how brutal the war was.
It is easy to see the mistakes now and also to recognize
that this country continues to make the same mistakes.
There was the belief we were in a global death struggle with
a monolithic and powerful enemy—Communism, and so we believed we had to take a
stand there. But we didn’t know the
land, the culture or how to fight a war there.
And we didn’t understand that the
Vietnamese were nationalists first and communists second.
There were also our government’s lies about the build up,
the bombing, the goals, the prospects for victory.
And we never had a viable partner governing South Vietnam,
who would fight corruption and find ways to win over the “hearts and minds” of
the population. We couldn’t do that on
our own.
It’s not that the North held the moral high ground. The North was a regime that at times was
brutal and repressive, and they were willing to sacrifice a huge number of
their young men and women in waging the war.
I visited Viet Nam in 2007 and 2008, the first time with
Judy, our friend Leta Myers and my Swedish colleague Stig Berg. Stig had begun a partnership between Jönköping University
and the Medical and Technical College #2 located in Da Nang (now Da
Nang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy) . The partnership was part of a larger EU
effort to form partnerships between universities in Europe and in developing
countries like Vietnam. There were
regular exchanges of faculty and students between the two universities and
there were plans for a joint research program, which is why Stig invited me to
visit. It was quickly obvious that Stig had built relationships with faculty
and students in Da Nang characterized by mutual respect and genuine affection
for one another. His colleagues from Jönköping University
who also visited at various times—Bo Malmberg, Susanne Johannesson and others,
also formed strong friendships with faculty and students.
I was struck by the optimism and energy I found at the college and
in the wider community. The students in
particular were bright, energetic and eager to learn. Life was not easy there and there were few of
the comforts we are used to. The
students’ dorms were remarkable—8 to 10 students crammed into a single room
filled with bunk beds. No
air-conditioning. Bathrooms down the
hall somewhere. Yet the students were
cheerful and upbeat, and were excited about the path they saw for their lives.
I doubt that Vietnam could have turned out any better if we had
somehow won the war and it certainly would have been better if there had been a
peaceful resolution of the conflict in 1962 or 1963, even if that led to a
Communist regime. There had certainly
been a period after the war of retaliation and imprisonment of supporters of
the regime in the South. And the current
government does not tolerate criticism or allow a political opposition. But the various governments in the South
showed similar authoritarian tendencies.
And the fear that we had that Southeast Asia would become dominated by
communism—that the dominoes would fall—never materialized. Instead, Vietnam fought a war with China and
overthrew the brutal Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia, and now they are our
allies in trying to contain China’s expansionist dreams.
One of the gifts of aging is learning from experience. There are lessons from the Vietnam War that
as a country we have yet to learn.
The photo is of Stig, Judy, Leta and one of our hosts in Da
Nang.